Europe Moves to Implement a Bold New
Chemical Policy to Protect Environmental and Public Health, While the US
Government And Industry Block
Progress
May 7, 2003
WASHINGTON,
May 7 /PRNewswire/ - Today, the European Union moves one step closer towards
launching a sweeping new policy initiative that would close a large loophole
in information and regulation on toxic chemicals, creating new structures for
government oversight of chemicals used in commerce and consumer products.
The policy would require that industry publicly provide basic health,
safety and environmental impact data for a long list of chemicals that have
not been tested for their impacts despite widespread use in everyday consumer
products.
The new
chemicals policy - called REACH, for Registration, Evaluation and
Authorization of Chemicals - will ensure that within an 11-year time frame,
all chemicals marketed over one ton per year must be accompanied by public
data on hazards or risk being prohibited from the market.
REACH would restrict the use of chemicals suspected of being
carcinogenic, reproductive toxins as well as those known to persist and
accumulate in the environment.
"US
NGOs welcome Europe's efforts to take this major step forward in promoting a
common-sense approach to managing the use of toxic substances," Daryl
Ditz, Senior Program Officer at World Wildlife Fund's US Toxics Programs.
"Since Europe is home to the largest chemical market in the world,
REACH has the potential to transform the global playing field, demanding
greater accountability from industry and rewarding companies that offer safer
products," concluded Ditz.
The REACH
proposal is expected to be officially released on the Internet for a five-week
public comment period. The United
States government and many industry lobbyists have voiced harsh opposition to
REACH. According to recent press reports, the US Department of Commerce is
planning a series of town meetings across the US to drum up opposition to the
European chemicals plan. The US
is also expected to lodge a formal protest to REACH.
"As the
American Chemistry Council and US government try to block progress in Europe,
they should heed the warning that a recent voter opinion survey shows that
over 80% of the voters in the states polled, overwhelmingly support policies
such as REACH," said Monica Rohde Buckhorn, Coordinator of the Alliance
for Safe Alternatives, which released its new polling data last month.
Most
Americans mistakenly believe that the US government routinely tests chemicals
used in consumer products to make sure they are safe, the polling data also
shows. However, lax chemical
regulations in the US have created a situation in which there is no basic
human health data available to the public for many of the 85,000-plus
chemicals on the market today. The
US chemical industry has a long history of widespread use of chemicals, such
as DDT, PCBs and CFCs, only to find out decades later that these chemicals
pose serious hazards to human health and the environment.
Recent studies demonstrate that many chemicals used in everyday
consumer products - such as perfluorinated compounds used in Teflon pans,
phthalates used in cosmetics, bisphenol A used in hard plastics, and
brominated flame retardants used in foams, fabrics and electronic goods - are
accumulating in our blood, mother's breast milk, and even in the bodies of
arctic polar bears. In laboratory
tests, these chemicals are increasingly associated with cancers and
reproductive problems that are on the rise in the United States.
"With
one in three Americans developing cancer, it is long overdue for US industry
and government to recognize the need for a new system that requires the
chemical industry to conduct basic health studies to ensure that their
products are not making people sick," said Alexandra McPherson, North
American Director of Clean Production Action.
The US
government cites unsubstantiated chemical industry claims that REACH will cost
American industries billions of dollars for the testing and evaluation of
chemicals. However, European estimates of the cost of REACH amount to less
than 0.1% of the chemical industry's annual sales.
Margot Wallstrom, the European Union's Environment Commissioner,
estimates that REACH will save $20 to $60 billion in health care costs over
the next thirty years, as well as reduce 2,200 to 4,300 cancer cases per year.
The release
is the joint statement of the following groups:
Alliance for a Clean Environment, Cancer Action NY, Center for
Environmental Health, Center for Health, Environment & Justice, Citizens
Environmental Coalition, Citizens Leading for Environmental Action and
Responsibility, Clean Production Action, Clean Water Action Alliance of
Massachusetts, Coalition for Health, Environmental & Economic Rights,
Connecticut Coalition for Environmental Justice, Consumers' Healthy Home
Center, Environmental Health Fund, Environmental Health Strategy Center,
Ecology Center, Friends of the Earth - USA, Global Community Monitor, Greater
Boston Physicians for Social Responsibility; Greenpeace USA, Institute for
Agriculture and Trade Policy, Institute for Children's Environmental Health,
Louisiana Environmental Action Network, Mercury Policy Project, Oregon
Environmental Council, Oregon Toxics Alliance, Science and Environmental
Health Network, Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, Strategic Counsel On
Corporate Accountability; Syracuse United Neighbors, Washington Toxics
Coalition, World Wildlife Fund USA, Women's Voices for the Earth, U.S. Public
Interest Research Group.
For more
information on key national, state and local policy work, please visit the
following websites:
www.healthytomorrow.org,
www.preventharm.org
www.watoxics.org,
http://www.worldwildlife.org/toxics/whatsnew/reach_qa.htm
www.safealternatives.org,
www.cleanproduction.org
www.greenpeace.org
World
Wildlife Fund USA
CONTACT:
Monica Rhode Buckhorn of Center for Health, Environment &
Justice, +1-703-237-2249, ext. 19; or Alexandra McPherson of Clean Production
Action, +1-716-805-1056
Web site:
http://www.healthytomorrow.org/
http://www.preventharm.org/
http://www.watoxics.org/
http://www.worldwildlife.org/toxics/whatsnew/reach_qa.htm
http://www.safealternatives.org/
http://www.cleanproduction.org/
http://www.greenpeace.org/
Source: Center for
Health, Environment & Justice; Clean Production Action;
|
|